Friday, 28 June 2019

Gradlympics: June Report

After Abingdon’s video gaming triumph – they led 5-4. Read on for reports from the next three episodes in the sports opera that is the Gradlympics.

Event No. 9: Netball
The Culham Sport and Social Association runs a wide range of social activities open to everyone on site. One of those is netball. It was a fiercely hot day. Seasons change, but the Gradlympics continues. Indeed the Gradlympics had been going so long, new reinforcements had arrived in the form of new graduates. 
As we started our practice, Livesey and Todd seemed stunned that everyone didn’t know all the rules. It seemed most of the men among us had missed out on a childhood rite of passage learning our Wing Defences from our Goal Attacks. 
Abingdon, as winners of basketball, began as slight favourites. But Oxford had reason for confidence. If there was one take-away from basketball it was that in the absence of skill, height is a damn good substitute.
So when Oxford stood taller than Abingdon in 6 of the 7 positions, they sensed an advantage. And so it proved in the early stages with Oxford taking a quick 3-0 lead. Abingdon were lost. They had barely touched the ball. 
There was good play all over from Oxford, but the star was Lukenskas. This was his event. As everyone else struggled to carefully line up their goal shots, he just seemed to drop them in. A deft hand, attached to a bruising body. Hawkes put in a fairly heroic defence in the face of Lukenskas’ aggression. But the score kept rising.
Abingdon, a little shell shocked, knew they had to change approach. With shorter, low bounce passes, they found some breakthroughs. In a very competitive second quarter Abingdon recorded their first scores. But they still trailed as Lukenskas found the net again.
The new faces were putting in very promising performances; Parry-Wright with some excellent catching and Berry with some smooth linking play with Fulton.
In the second half Oxford excelled in the midfield. Todd and Quirk up front were starved of ball as Oxford dominated possession. Their penetrating attacks were converted at an overwhelming rate. 
The game paused when Measures was catapulted into the tarmac. Was his jostling too great, or his legs too speedy? After about 5 minutes, we notice a few conspicuous blood stains on the ball. 
The game ended 10-3 to Oxford. This was one of the most one-sided events of the Gradlympics. Oxford may be ruing Lukenskas’ absence from the basketball. Things were level again at 5-5.
The teams warm up on court

Event No. 10: Laser Tag
This was a long-awaited event. Talk of a laser tag social predates the Gradlympics. Hell it predates most of the graduates. An archived social, revived.
Into a gladiatorial arena walked the twelve graduates. It was very dark, very hot. Dim coloured bulbs lit up a selection of barrels and wooden panelling. The teams lined up beside their bases, setting up guard through peepholes.
Now from a journalistic perspective, when the objective of this game is essentially to hide in a dark room, one can only offer so much as commentary. A round was typified by periods of tense emptiness, stalking and shuffling, punctured by flashes of green and red crossing paths. 
It could be frustrating at times. You could be camped up, hidden with three walls of cover, and lo your body starts flashing. You’d been hit. Where from? Who by? From the darkness. By the enemy.
In the first round Hawkes pressed up high against Moore and Morgan, who held behind the exposed entrance to Oxford’s base. Cooper and Quirk prowled the midfield. Summer placement student Hershmann made darting attacks then retreated. Bookless was the lone defender of the Abingdon base, mainly because no one else had worked out where the base was. 
Out of the arena we quickly looked for a score. We found a lot of large numbers on a screen. It seemed the Cooper was rated 200000, top scoring for Abingdon. Whether that was points, bullets or teabags it didn’t really matter because after a few seconds the scores were gone without trace. Hershmann took top spot for Oxford. Overall, on an unrelated scale, a score of 2300-2100 to Oxford. 
We questioned the scoring system: “It’s too complicated to explain, you wouldn’t understand” our host generously said. 
In the second round people were wiser. They began to realise that the true strategy was to first get a kill which activated automatic fire. Then go full Rambo. Livesey and Oxford attacked more and succeeded in destroying the Abingdon base. A rewarding scoreline. 2400-2000 Oxford.
In the last round Abingdon, with nothing to lose, went all out. Todd kept watch while the rest launched an assault. Oxford’s base, for the first time, was breached. Under such a high press, Oxford tried to outflank them, with only moderate success. Abingdon won 2300-2000.
Cooper was up to 415000. But the top scorer again was Hershmann, a fantastic debut. 2-1 to Oxford. Oxford were back in the Gradlympics lead 6-5.
Abingdon

Oxford

Event No. 11: Pub Quiz
Covering everything from neutron stars, to Dr Neo Cortex, to the peak chart position of “Baby shark”, this pub quiz had everything. Everything except a pub.
The desks were laden with chocolate, sweets and doughnuts. This quiz had food. Delicious, unhealthy food. The graduate scheme panel had put together 10 diverse, testing rounds. We extend a huge thanks to all that helped come up with questions. 
The most interesting and innovative part of the quiz was the split round structure, which made each team choose how to split their squad every round. It gave teams meaningful, difficult decisions on how to distribute their knowledge base. This quiz had strategy. On the front table were the classic quiz rounds such as Music, Science and General Knowledge. Out back had more unusual tests on Culham or Donald Trump’s tweets.
Among the more interesting answers – Abingdon incorrectly solved the dingbat for “A Song of Ice and Fire” as “Sing with the ice cream in the flames”. So close, but also, so not. No team correctly knew the meaning of the acronym OAS. Thankfully for fusion there was more success on MAST-U and ITER.
After the last entertaining round, the teams waited with bated breath. 128-122. Oxford had won. It was over.







But wait. 
Someone put the X-files music on.
A round had been missed. Now 146-141. But that was only the start. Tokamak Tales today brings you a behind the scenes scoop. A sneak peek of the quiz answers.
If you are of virtuous mind you may want to look away now. Some of the images viewers might find upsetting. 
We’ve all seen a wrong answer marked right. But have you ever seen a wrong answer, crossed out, and marked wrong – marked right? Behold. Swiftly followed by Frozen’s Idina Menzel, awarded correct for Oxford, incorrect for Abingdon.
More hope, you would think, for the unambiguous True/False rounds. And yet…
There were more. All rounds bar two were recounted. When accounted for, unbelievably, Abingdon stood 2 points clear. The Gradlympics had gone a couple of rounds without controversy. About time for another. On the one hand Abingdon were ahead, but without a complete recount, things were not confirmable. 
The mobs began taking their sides “Based on the information you have, Abingdon should win!”  “If there are missing answers it's a bit tricky to declare a winner..” “We really can only make a call on the numbers we have received”. 
The president, with democracy failing him, declared a draw. The scores were held at 6-5 Oxford entering into the final two events. Stay tuned. 

No comments:

Post a Comment